Impact of COVID-19 in relation to the outpatient pediatric feeding therapy experience: A speech-language pathologist's review of literature and professional experience.

It is well known in the medical and pediatric feeding community how parental stress affects outcomes of pediatric nutrition and feeding behaviors. There is growing literature suggesting the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to caregiver and child stress. It could be suggested that this increase in stress contributed to or exacerbated pediatric feeding difficulties. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in pediatric rehabilitation therapists quickly transitioning from in-person to virtual evaluation and treatment models. The purpose of this article is to review current literature regarding the definition and prevalence of pediatric feeding disorder, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on parent/child stress and relationships surrounding feeding, and this speech-language pathologist's perception of both the positive and negative aspects of providing ongoing outpatient feeding evaluations and treatments in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as clinical considerations for ongoing feeding therapy after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic on Dysfunctional Eating Behaviors and Symptoms among the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: The coronavirus outbreak has been publicly and formally defined a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11th 2020. Some extreme but effective safety measures have been applied in order to limit the spread of the infection among the population. The price of COVID-19 restrictive measures and lockdowns has been especially heavy for individual's mental health. There is previous evidence that the COVID-19-related lockdown has impacted on mental health worsening among individuals with Feeding and Eating Disorders (EDs) and clinical obesity. Potential affecting aspects might have been restriction to daily activities and movements, excessive exposure to harmful eating patterns on social media, emotional distress, fear of contagion, and low access to treatment and care. Nevertheless, especially on the basis of the proven-detrimental impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on in- dividuals with clinical eating disorders, home confinement might analogously have had a negative impact also on the eating behaviors of individuals from the general population. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prevalence of EDs symptoms and dysfunctional eating behaviours (i.e. emotional overeating, night eating, snacking, binge eating, undereating, food avoidance) among the general population. Method(s): We searched eligible articles in Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science. Prevalence rates were pooled with meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was tested using I-squared (I2) statistics. A total of 221 studies met the inclusion criteria. Result(s): The pooled prevalence of increased body weight was 33% (95% CI 30-35) among individuals in 84 studies. Forty-five percent (95% CI 31-59) of participants in 10 studies experienced body shape concern, body dissatisfaction and body misperception. Other EDs symptoms increased in the general population during the pandemic, such as overeating (41%;95% CI 33-48), food cravings (36%;95% CI 12- 59), binge eating (35%;95% CI 20-51), emotional eating (28%;95% CI 23-33) and snacking (27%;95% CI 23-32). Food restriction, excessive physical activity, weight loss and night eating were also common. Pooled data of longitudinal studies showed a significant difference in BMI and dysfunctional eating behaviours before and during the pandemic. Conclusion(s): This meta-analysis evidenced a negative impact of the pandemic on eating behaviors among the general population. Overall, these results highlight the need for further high-quality longitudinal studies that examine which specific populations experienced higher distress than others, and what are the long-term negative consequences of COVID-19.

Development and Pilot Testing of Telesimulation for Pediatric Feeding: A Feasibility Study.

Simulation enables learners to practice new skills in a supportive environment. Largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, simulation via telepractice, i.e., telesimulation, has emerged. Viable delivery of telesimulation requires consideration of the adaptations needed to conduct simulation via telepractice. The aim of this study was to design and pilot test the feasibility of using telesimulation to provide training in infant feeding management. An iterative process was used across four phases: (1) simulation design, (2) telesimulation adaptations, (3) user testing, feedback, and modifications, and (4) user testing of modified simulation, feedback, and final modifications. During Phases 1 and 2, team members worked together to design and test telepractice adaptations for a simulation experience. During Phases 3 and 4, the telesimulation was pilot tested with a group of speech pathologists, with feedback sought via open-ended survey questions and/or an optional focus group. Manifest content analysis was used to interpret user feedback. In Phase 2, several adaptations were explored to optimize telesimulation delivery and engagement, including Zoom® functions (e.g., 'spotlighting,' digital backgrounds) and supplementary video/auditory files. There were 11 participants across Phases 3 and 4. Specific feedback centered around simulation preparation and structure, session practicalities, supports for realism, Zoom® functions, group dynamics, participants' experiences, and future enhancements. An overall list of recommendations for telesimulation was generated. Telesimulation for feeding management was considered feasible and participant feedback was favorable. Further research is required to investigate if the learner outcomes of telesimulation are comparable to in-person simulation for infant feeding management.

The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Number and Severity of New Diagnoses of Restrictive Eating Disorders during Prolonged Lockdown in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on the well-being of adolescents and young adults. Worldwide, eating disorder (ED) experts have observed worsening symptoms in youth with pre-existing EDs and an escalation in the number of new cases compared to prior years. Disruption of routine, work and school closures, as well as social isolation are potential contributing factors. The Canadian province of Ontario (specifically the most highly populated cities) experienced one of the most prolonged lock downs worldwide with approximately 20 weeks of face-to-face school closure and/or restriction to virtual learning. OBJECTIVE(S): We sought to better understand the impact of COVID- 19 on new pediatric ED presentations, patient characteristics and hospital admissions in a tertiary care Children's Hospital. DESIGN/METHODS: We completed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting for new ED assessments at a single centre pediatric ED program within a tertiary care children's hospital between January 1st, 2015 and June 1st 2021. Patients aged 9-18 years old with a new diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa (AN) restrictive type or binge/purge type or Other Specified Feeding and Eating Disorder (OSFED) - Atypical Anorexia Nervosa (AAN) were included. Demographic and clinical variables for pre and post pandemic were analyzed using Chi-Square and T-Tests. Interrupted time series regression was used to examine pre-pandemic and post-pandemic monthly summary data over time. RESULT(S): Overall, 425 youth were newly diagnosed with AN or AAN (N=329 pre-pandemic, N=96 pandemic) during the study period (Jan 1 2015 - December 31 2020). Average age was 14.7 years (SD 1.8, range 8.1 - 17.9). Most youth were diagnosed with DSM-5 AN-restrictive type (65.6%). The number of new diagnoses of AN and AAN during the pandemic more than doubled when compared to pre-pandemic years. In the 5-year period preceding the pandemic, mean number of newly diagnosed cases was 5.1/ month (scoeff=0.043, p=0.33), increasing to 10.6/month (p=<0.001) during the pandemic and demonstrating an upward trend coinciding with onset of lockdown measures (scoeff=5.95, p<0.001). At the time of initial assessment, more youth presented with medical instability and increased illness severity. Hospitalization increased from an average of 2.2/month to 6.3/month (scoeff -0.008 vs. 3.23, p<0.0001). Average heart rate also decreased from 58.6 bpm (SD 16.6) pre-pandemic to 53.3 bpm (SD 16.3), p<0.008. CONCLUSION(S): With this study, we found a significant increase in both new diagnoses and admissions for medical instability for AN and AAN among youth at our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study contributes to the growing body of global evidence tracking the unanticipated surge of eating disorder diagnoses and severity in already under-resourced health systems. It is unclear how long the effects of the pandemic may last. Further research is required to better understand the illness trajectory and treatment outcomes of pandemic-triggered EDs in adolescents.

Mapping the gaps: A scoping review of research on pediatric feeding disorder.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) is defined as impaired oral intake that is not age-appropriate, and is associated with medical, nutritional, feeding skill, and/or psychosocial dysfunction. As PFD is prevalent and increasing, so are publications on the topic; however, the research literature is often disparate in terminology used and siloed by discipline. Greater understanding of the current research concerning PFD will help identify areas in need of further study. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the extent, range, and nature of research activities concerning PFD and to identify gaps in the empirical literature. METHODS: Three electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched using terms related to pediatric feeding disorder, which include, but not limited to, "feeding disorder/problem/difficulty", "avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID)", "dysphagia", "selective/picky eating", "problematic mealtime behaviors" or "food refusal". The following limits were placed on the search: full text, humans, English, and age limit (up to 18 years old), and publication date (last 10 years). Covidence software was used to facilitate a systematic data management/analysis. Two people in the research team independently reviewed each result (screening titles and abstracts first, then moving to the full texts) to identify studies that met our inclusion/exclusion criteria and conflicts were resolved through a team discussion. Data were charted regarding disciplines of the authors, study purposes, study settings/locations, study methodologies, and study participants. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses were used to summarize the characteristics of the studies. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 5354 articles after removing duplicates between the databases. With a final set of articles (n = 415), data charting was completed. The majority of studies were completed by authors from Psychology (n = 171) and Medicine (n = 123). The most studied aims were to examine attributes of feeding problems (n = 168) and/or factors associated with feeding problems (n = 183). Sample size median was 53. A total of 166 of the 415 studies examined the effect of an intervention, treatment, or program, but dose of the intervention was difficult or impossible to report across studies. Feeding was studied as an outcome in 400 out of the 415 studies. A closer accounting of the systematically developed parent-report tools revealed 50 distinct parent report tools used across the subset of studies utilizing parent report outcomes (n = 123). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this scoping review highlight the designs and methods used in research on PFD. This reveals critical gaps in knowledge generation and barriers to intervention replication.

Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments.

There is currently limited evidence supporting the use of telepractice to conduct bottle-feeding assessments. This study aimed to investigate the inter-rater reliability of bottle-feeding assessments conducted via synchronous telepractice (real-time videoconferencing). Secondary aims were to investigate parent and clinician satisfaction. Bottle-feeding skills of 30 children (aged 1 month-2 years) were simultaneously assessed by a telepractice SP (T-SP) at a remote location and an in-person SP (IP-SP) at the family home. A purpose-designed assessment form was used to evaluate: (1) developmental level (screen only), (2) state, color, and respiration, (3) oral motor skills, (4), infant oral reflexes, (5) tongue tie (screen only), (6) non-nutritive suck, (7) bottle-feeding, (8) overall feeding skills and (9) recommendations. Results of the T-SP and IP-SP assessments were compared using agreement statistics. Parents reported perceptions of telepractice pre and post session, and also rated post-session satisfaction. The telepractice SP completed a satisfaction questionnaire post-appointment. The majority of assessment components (45/53, 85%) met the agreement criteria (≥80% exact agreement). Difficulties were noted for the assessment of palate integrity, gagging during non-nutritive suck assessment, and 6 components of the tongue tie screen. Parent and clinician satisfaction was high; SPs reported that they would offer telepractice services to 93% of families again in the future. Overall, the results demonstrated that most components of a bottle-feeding assessment could be reliably completed via synchronous telepractice in family homes. However, further research is required to improve the reliability of some intra-oral assessment components.